Skip to main content

Of Making Many Books

And further, by these, my son, be admonished: of making many books there is no end (Ecclesiastes 12:12) A pdf version of this essay  can be downloaded here [*] Years in brackets refer to an individual’s or book author’s year of birth Thought experiment for the day: Anyone born 1945 would be pushing towards 80 and mostly past their prime. So name any Charedi sefer written by someone born post war that has or is likely to enter the canon, be it haloche, lomdus, al hatorah or mussar. Single one will do for now — IfYouTickleUs (@ifyoutickleus) July 27, 2022 A tweet in the summer which gained some traction asked for a book by an author born from 1945 onwards that has entered the Torah and rabbinic canon or is heading in that direction. I didn't exactly phrase it this way and some quibbled about 'canonisation'. The word does indeed have a precise meaning though in its popular use it has no narrow definition. Canonisation, or ‘entering the canon’ is generally understood to...
82 comments

Where’s Hillary?

Spot the difference:

article-1384861-0BE77AA700000578-654_634x406 - Copy

© The White House

WH sans Hillary - Copy

© Di Tzeitung (a Brooklyn chasidic weekly)

(Credit: Circus Tent)

This on the other hand is perfectly kosher

skver and hillary - Copy

Comments

  1. Anonymous09 May, 2011 17:27

    Surely you cant compare the two. If someone sees a woman drowning one is called a chasid shote for not saving her. This 'great' rebbe has his chasidim in prison, (some died there and some have just been released), surely he is allowed to do his best to get them out. And if it means having a photo with Mrs Clinton its not worse than seeing a woman drowning. You must also remember this 'great' rebbe was the one who said on shabbos in his Torah that Bin Laden would be caught the next day. How can you even question his motives. This is not a pinter youre talking about. A bit of derech erez is called for. Aren't you even scared to attack him seeing that he knows what goes on in heaven. Surely you dont think a person on his great madrega even looked at Mrs Clinton. Like the gemoro says he imagined her like a piece of wood on his shoulders when carrying a kalla.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Bray of Fundie09 May, 2011 19:54

    you photoshopped the bottom photo right?

    ReplyDelete
  3. IfYouTickleUs09 May, 2011 20:24

    @BoF Not at all. If you google Clinton New Square you'll find a link to the Bill Clinton library website where there is an etire series of photos. He was there to seek a pardon for some of his crooks and Hillary needed him (didn't) to get some of the votes he could obtain for her at shaleshides.

    BTW I just checked out your blog and credit for this story goes to Hirshl at Circus Tent who was first with it. Most blogs pinched his photo too though yours truly went out to get a copy of the paper.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mark09 May, 2011 20:24

    Bray - you photoshopped the bottom photo right?

    Looks like someone photoshopped a picture of a woman into the picture. Oy vey!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous10 May, 2011 06:22

    'He was there to seek a pardon for some of his crooks'
    Thats not a nice thing to say. The money didnt go to his crooks they all worked 'lshem shomaim' or should I say lshem the rebbe.
    He was the one who enjoyed the proceeds while his chasidim rotted in prison.

    ReplyDelete
  6. IfYouTickleUs10 May, 2011 18:05

    I wouldn't be so sure that they didn't benefit at all. But even if you're right, still ein sholiach lidvar aveiro.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous10 May, 2011 18:22

    This aint an aveiro. To make the rebbe rich!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

UPDATED REMINDER: PLEASE REFRAIN FROM USING ANONYMOUS!
I've been requested to remind commenters to stick to a handle so that discussions can be easily followed. Thank you!

Popular posts from this blog

Of Making Many Books

And further, by these, my son, be admonished: of making many books there is no end (Ecclesiastes 12:12) A pdf version of this essay  can be downloaded here [*] Years in brackets refer to an individual’s or book author’s year of birth Thought experiment for the day: Anyone born 1945 would be pushing towards 80 and mostly past their prime. So name any Charedi sefer written by someone born post war that has or is likely to enter the canon, be it haloche, lomdus, al hatorah or mussar. Single one will do for now — IfYouTickleUs (@ifyoutickleus) July 27, 2022 A tweet in the summer which gained some traction asked for a book by an author born from 1945 onwards that has entered the Torah and rabbinic canon or is heading in that direction. I didn't exactly phrase it this way and some quibbled about 'canonisation'. The word does indeed have a precise meaning though in its popular use it has no narrow definition. Canonisation, or ‘entering the canon’ is generally understood to...
82 comments
Read more

“A Victim’s Perspective”

The following is a letter from one of Todros Grynhaus’s victims who testified at the trial when Grynhaus was convicted. The letter is addressed to 3 named so called ‘askonim’ who were involved in Grynhaus’s defence. The letter was written during the first trial when the jury were unable to reach a verdict . Grynhaus was convicted this week after a second trial. This letter is published with the written consent of its author. [Name and address] 8th March 2015 Dear Mr [], Mr [] & Mr [] I am addressing this letter to you, as part of the leading askonim looking to protect, defend and ultimately exonerate the notorious criminal in regards his current court case; I am aware that there are many other askonim involved and I am happy that they all take note of the points I put forward. Of course we are all mindful of that fact, that now that case has started, there is little your team can actually do, aside sitting and fidgeting in the public gallery ea...
73 comments
Read more

Prepare to meet thy machers

If you live in Golders Green where you are wont to honour the ethos of the Union in its breach you will have ‘another opportunity’ to meet your masters. If however you are unfortunate enough to live in Stamford Hill please stay there and do not even dream of gatecrashing as by the size of your beard and length of your jacket shall ye be known and many have of late been expelled. Unless you are one of the panellists in which case it appears you are not welcome unless you are from Stamford Hill as it is only we who know what's right and wrong for you. Your role in Yiddishkeit is to turn up, pay up and shut up while we ‘are you moitse’ in the more pesky areas. Perhaps shutting up should be qualified since questions may be put a couple of light years ahead of the meeting or 'via the chairman' so as to ensure what not to address. It is not for this blog which generally limits itself to the holy square mile to comment on a meeting to which we weren’t invited even first time r...
34 comments
Read more