Skip to main content

Of Making Many Books

And further, by these, my son, be admonished: of making many books there is no end (Ecclesiastes 12:12) A pdf version of this essay  can be downloaded here [*] Years in brackets refer to an individual’s or book author’s year of birth Thought experiment for the day: Anyone born 1945 would be pushing towards 80 and mostly past their prime. So name any Charedi sefer written by someone born post war that has or is likely to enter the canon, be it haloche, lomdus, al hatorah or mussar. Single one will do for now — IfYouTickleUs (@ifyoutickleus) July 27, 2022 A tweet in the summer which gained some traction asked for a book by an author born from 1945 onwards that has entered the Torah and rabbinic canon or is heading in that direction. I didn't exactly phrase it this way and some quibbled about 'canonisation'. The word does indeed have a precise meaning though in its popular use it has no narrow definition. Canonisation, or ‘entering the canon’ is generally understood to

Disjointed Union

Many of you have probably seen this but here it is anyway for those who haven’t.

I won’t have time to do anything humorous for Purim but who needs humour when the head of the poultry division chickens out of a public meeting?

 

Comments

  1. The Chofetz Chaim wrote the Mishnah Brurah in order to remove the power from the leaders and put it in the hands of the lay people. This was done to counter-act the threat of Reform and continue with the setting up of the Chareidi movement, as begun by the Chasam Sofer.

    After the War, the leaders of the Chareidi Oilam have reversed the trend: By complicating and centralising Halacha to the nth degree they have made it impossible for your average Jew to understand. More than that, they have removed the power from the individual to be responsible for his own actions and destiny, making him feel too feeble in the Torah world to decide for himself what is right for him and his family.

    What happened to the real Judaism as practiced for thousands of years - prior to Emancipation? Real Judaism was a continuation of family traditions. You learnt about neigel wasser, brachos, candle lighting etc from your mother, who learnt it from her mother, who learnt it from hers etc. There were no great volumes expostulating on the tiny intricacies that seem to overtake Jewish life nowadays (if the Rabbis had their way).

    They have done the equivalent of emasculation to Judaism. No longer do you have the power to choose your actions and decide for yourself what is right or wrong, what G-d asks of you, what your responsibility is in this world. Toe the line or you are out.

    Is Judaism really about how the drops of water fall on your hands when washing for bread? Or is Judaism about being aware of G-d's presence at all times and acting accordingly. To me it seems the message has become distorted in the last few generations.

    When the Chasam Sofer saw the dangers of Emancipation and created the Chareidi world - did he anticipate the depths to which it had sunk?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I doubt if AZ is a SH resident or even a GG one. That was certainly not the intention of the Chofets Chaim. We London residents do not consider our rabbonim to be over-burdening us with strict halachos. We may not all agree to not having an eiruv, but we do succumb to our rabinic leaders who say that it cant be done. Although no explanation is given to why it can be done everywhere else like in yerusholaim which has many more Jewish people. Your post is more suitable for the US blogs, from where you most likely are, where no frum blogs exist having all been taken over by the MO.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good sir, I appreciate your fine craftsmanship of the English language. Further evidence that one needn't be an ignoramus and religiously devout.

    I was seriously considering moving "across the pond" to the GG community at one point, but unfortunately, it was not meant to be...

    My question for you is as follows: I saw the following comment on another blogsite which typically deals with local Heimish and Lakewood issues, I was wondering what your take on it might be.

    http://bit.ly/g4n4ME

    ReplyDelete
  4. Actually, a heimishe Golders Greener born and bred. But I study, read and find out.

    Look into it and you will find my comments are historically accurate.

    Regarding the Eiruv - the world experts in Eiruvin declared it more stringently Kosher in GG than in Yerushalayim.

    Of course you must follow the Rav that you have chosen (ASEH Lechah Rav) but don't let your life's choices be dictated without options.

    Surely, Judaism is about personal choice and personal effort to Mitzvos. Not by following a dictatorship without choice?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

UPDATED REMINDER: PLEASE REFRAIN FROM USING ANONYMOUS!
I've been requested to remind commenters to stick to a handle so that discussions can be easily followed. Thank you!

Popular posts from this blog

Of Making Many Books

And further, by these, my son, be admonished: of making many books there is no end (Ecclesiastes 12:12) A pdf version of this essay  can be downloaded here [*] Years in brackets refer to an individual’s or book author’s year of birth Thought experiment for the day: Anyone born 1945 would be pushing towards 80 and mostly past their prime. So name any Charedi sefer written by someone born post war that has or is likely to enter the canon, be it haloche, lomdus, al hatorah or mussar. Single one will do for now — IfYouTickleUs (@ifyoutickleus) July 27, 2022 A tweet in the summer which gained some traction asked for a book by an author born from 1945 onwards that has entered the Torah and rabbinic canon or is heading in that direction. I didn't exactly phrase it this way and some quibbled about 'canonisation'. The word does indeed have a precise meaning though in its popular use it has no narrow definition. Canonisation, or ‘entering the canon’ is generally understood to

“A Victim’s Perspective”

The following is a letter from one of Todros Grynhaus’s victims who testified at the trial when Grynhaus was convicted. The letter is addressed to 3 named so called ‘askonim’ who were involved in Grynhaus’s defence. The letter was written during the first trial when the jury were unable to reach a verdict . Grynhaus was convicted this week after a second trial. This letter is published with the written consent of its author. [Name and address] 8th March 2015 Dear Mr [], Mr [] & Mr [] I am addressing this letter to you, as part of the leading askonim looking to protect, defend and ultimately exonerate the notorious criminal in regards his current court case; I am aware that there are many other askonim involved and I am happy that they all take note of the points I put forward. Of course we are all mindful of that fact, that now that case has started, there is little your team can actually do, aside sitting and fidgeting in the public gallery ea

UOHC Writes to Reb Tickle

For those increasingly concerned that Reb Tickle may gradually be joining the Arsekonim class we have some disappointing news: Reb Tickle is corresponding directly with that august body known as UOHC. The only thing I can say in my defence is that they started it by writing to me first and myself being deferential to authority and submissive to Daas Torah had no option but to reply, about 10 lines for each line of theirs. The missive was in response to Reb Tickle's recent droshe. The sender must I'm afraid remain without a name - no UOHC officer with the right hashkofeh would be seen here even in their finest Purim mask - and the cc list, which reads like an A-class shiduchim list, must also remain classified. But due to UOHC's deeply held conviction on the public's right to know permission for republication was graciously granted and hope is being expressed in certain quarters of awarding Reb Tickle in due course a serving of the recently stewed Keddasia alphabet soup.